Much of what apogr wrote is beyond me, but I was moved by this distillation of
key problems:
The problems, as I see them, include
a) uneven use of "scale"
b) no check for completeness on a particular level
I find these to be pervasive problems, both for WP as a whole (in
creating projects,
defining category-sets, identifying key subject areas), for each of
its subprojects
(in creating article-lists, identifying goals of equal importance,
covering an entire
topic), and for each individual article (in balancing detail across
aspects of an
article, maintaining consistent perspective, and maintaining a connection with
other articles at higher and lower levels of detail).
+sj+
b) it is a semi-finished colouring book with clolours
of uneven intensity
c) it is a number of diligent tube-sighted people caught in the process of
lace-making
ps - these gems should surely go on the list of [[what wikipedia is]]...
_ _ :-------.-.--------.--.--------.-.--------.--.--------[...]