On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 14:17, Achal
Prabhala<aprabhala(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is an excellent idea. However, to cut down
on frivolous closure
requests, will you also make more explicit on the page (within the
policy) that requests for closure can *no longer* be based upon
inactivity alone? My understanding is that langcom has quite a lot to
take care of anyway, and this will simply forestall irrelevant requests
that cause inadvertent panic, like in the case of Sesotho and Xitsonga
recently.
Is this better?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Closing_projects_policy&act…
Yes indeed. Many thanks!
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l