Mike,
I think it was my fault mis-reading your original message. My apologies.
Deryck
On 10 March 2012 21:22, Michael Peel <michael.peel(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
On second thoughts/read-through, I want to retract my
previous email. I
skim-read through Tom's email, and was thinking more in terms of 'Wikimedia
Commons' vs ''Commons' in terms of 'House of Commons', and hence
there
being high-profile visibility for the Wikimedia sister projects. I was
_not_ replying in terms of the 'Page 3' interpretation as per the newspaper
that goes under the name of 'The Sun', which I think is fundamentally
sexist and ethically wrong.
Mike
On 9 Mar 2012, at 16:03, Deryck Chan wrote:
Yes, hence I think it's time for page 3 to
start taking good pictures
*from* Commons! ;)
On Mar 9, 2012 3:56 PM, "Richard Symonds" <
richard.symonds(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
I think there are probably enough page 3 photos
on commons already,
don't you? ;-)
Richard Symonds
Office & Development Manager
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0992
--
Wikimedia UK is the operating name of Wiki UK Limited, a Charitable
Company
Registered in England and Wales, No: 6741827.
Charity No:1144513 Office:
4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street,
London EC2A 4LT.
Wikimedia UK is the local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate
Wikipedia, amongst other projects). It is an
independent non-profit
organization with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for
its contents.
On 09/03/2012 15:52, Deryck Chan wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2012 2:35 PM, "Michael Peel"
<michael.peel(a)wikimedia.org.uk>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 9 Mar 2012, at 14:32, Tom Morris wrote:
> >
> > > On 9 March 2012 13:48, Charles Matthews <
charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > >>
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/who-are-the-commons-moles-cha…
> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Headline: "Who are the Commons moles changing Wikipedia
entries?"
>> > >
>> > > My initial thought was "Commons people aren't allowed to
edit
>> > > Wikipedia?" (and also something along the lines of "well, we
know
>> > > Commons people like their 'nude or semi-nude women with
Muppets',
but
> > > even so, calling them
'moles' seems a bit harsh!").
> > >
> > > Then I grokked that it was the House of Commons, not Wikimedia
Commons.
> > >
> > > Too much time at the coal face, methinks.
> >
> > I thought exactly the same thing, followed by "ooh, there's a
Wikimedia Commons article on page 3 of the Independent! Fantastic!". Should
have known better. ;-)
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> What I read: "There's a Wikimedia Commons picture on page 3!" Anyone
takers on Commons for the challenge? ;)
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org