-- like a vibrant pink logo, á la Amnesty International's colour schemes (but WMUK :)). However, I doubt that the Wikimedia Identity Guidelines would let us. Perhaps a logo such as [love needed], although that's more of an inside joke? There's some alternative fundraising banners floating around at Meta that we could adapt if we wanted slogans. A WMUK logo with a monospace "<3", as we're internet based, washed out in the background? http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines Douglas Gardner -----Original Message----- From: wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediauk-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of geni Sent: 30 November 2009 11:54 PM To: wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 52, Issue 5 2009/11/30 zeyi &lt;zeyi.he(a)googlemail.com&gt;om>: I was talking about image size and colour. What requirements does the image need to meet? -- geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:03 +0000, David Gerard wrote: Sometimes it is easier to ask forgiveness than permission. ;-) If you're prepared to quickly take down anything deemed too horrific you should not have any issue experimenting with logo design variants. Based on the current fundraiser, I think the volunteers can do better than most pro advertising agencies. It's in the metrics the ad agencies are really good for. -- Brian McNeil <brian.mcneil@wikinewsie.org>|http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil Content of this message in no way represents the opinions or official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its projects. * Problems replying? Forward bounces to brianmc(a)skynet.be to raise with Godaddy Hosting.