Because it was written independently and is more about me than the general call for
contributions (although I wanted to highlight that too in case it could widen
participation).
If it's of general interest it can go on the wmuk blog but it strikes me that it lacks
wider appeal (I have also jokingly noted that quantity of blogs is a KPI for
me...fortunately my readership numbers are not).
Having said that it is no bad thing to have publicity spread across venues.
I don't mind answering such 'out of interest' questions but I'm not sure
they need to go to the whole mailing list.
S
-----Original Message-----
From: wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Fæ
Sent: 04 February 2014 14:06
To: Wikimedia Mailing List; UK Wikimedia mailing list
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wikimedia-l] Have your say on Wikimedia UK's strategy
On 4 February 2014 11:32, Stevie Benton <stevie.benton(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
...
You may also be interested in a related blog post by
Simon
Knight<http://people.kmi.open.ac.uk/knight/2014/02/wikimedia-uk-strate
gy-consultation/>, one of the WMUK trustees who has been closely
involved in this work.
Out of interest, why is Simon's post about WMUK's strategy on his professional
blog, rather than hosting it directly on WMUK's own blog rather than just a
redirecting blog post
<https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2014/02/have-your-say-on-wikimedia-uks-strategy/>?
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
http://j.mp/faewm
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk