On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Kirill Lokshin < kirill.lokshin(a)wikimediadc.org&gt; wrote: Thanks for sharing this, and congrats on publishing what looks like a great plan. One part I think is a bit vague is the one about analytics development. At the beginning, you give the example of using WikiMetrics to measure outcomes of edit-a-thons and such, which is great. Then you take a second tack later in the document, saying Wikimedia DC will support "the development and maintenance of a stable set of online tools that can be used by partner institutions" including creating "a single analytics report which will aggregate statistics from various existing tools". Analytics tool development is a complex and difficult problem. In addition to our technical challenges, there seems to always be many competing priorities you have to balance, even if you just focus on one end user. If Wikimedia DC is going to venture in to this territory, I think you could be clearer about whether you're going to first focus on measurement of your own programs, or if building a tool(s) for partner institutions is really something you're best placed to do. These two things have very very different requirements when it comes to how much money you'd need, people resources, and so on. If you're seriously considering building an analytics report of some kind, I would highly encourage you to reach out the Analytics team at the WMF, for technical advice and advice from the team of research analysts. (The public analytics mailing list is a good place to start.) They can also help you when it comes to figuring out stakeholder analysis and collecting concise requirements from end users of any analytics tools, since it's something they have to do inside the Foundation. Steven