Yeah, we are already including GLAM articles in the COTM. IMO, lets first
get as many editors for the COTM and make the base strong. Once that is
done, we can have a new branch of the INCOTM dedicated for GLAM.
Regards,
Pratik Lahoti
User:BPositive <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User%3aBPositive>
I think a GLAM COTM was suggested earlier, but clearly we dont have the
bench strength for a 3rd COTM at the moment, we are
barely managing the
current ones.