I think that Michael is right.
Regards
Diptanshu
On 21-Mar-2018 12:44 AM, "Michaël Laurent" <michael.laurent(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Conversely, perhaps we should also ask reviewers if
we can include their
identity and comments if we transfer a paper to another journal?
BW ML
Op di 20 mrt. 2018 15:56 schreef Mikael Häggström <
editor.in.chief(a)wikijmed.org>gt;:
Hello all WikiJournal participants,
There's been an interesting conversation in the editorial board of
WikiJournal of Science of a case where an article had previously been
submitted to another journal, received peer reviews, gotten declined, and
now submitted to WikiJournal. Points raised include that the reputability
of that other journal can be taken into account in accepting their peer
reviews, and it seems unethical to omit important comments previously
raised. Yet, we cannot ignore our peer reviewer criteria
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Peer_reviewers>.
It seems we need to know the identity of the peer reviewers in order to
make this judgement. I think this is further necessitated by the fact that
we may want to complement the peer review, and we'd risk asking the same
reviewer a second time if we don't know the identity of the reviewer.
I've made a section at Editorial_guidelines#Importing_reviews
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Editorial_guidelines#Importing_reviews>
(template
currently adapted for WikiJournal of Medicine but which should be up for
the other journals as well in a near future) with the text:
"In case a work has already undergone a peer review by another journal or
reviewing service, that peer review can be accepted by WikiJournal of
Medicine if the peer reviewer criteria
<https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Peer_reviewers#Criteria>
are
met. This requires that the editorial board gets to know the identity of
the peer reviewer, and that the reviewer agrees to have it published under
creative commons license (CC BY-SA
<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>). External peer
reviews that do not fulfill these criteria should still be uploaded if
possible, but do not count to the minimum of 2 independent peer reviews for
each article."
Feel free to suggest further edits to this.
I suggest we continue discussions in wiki:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_
Group#Importing_peer_reviews
Best regards,
Mikael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"WikiJMed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to wijoumed+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to wijoumed(a)googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/group/wijoumed.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/
msgid/wijoumed/CACubOwjH_%2Bs%2BVQuYJsZr9oR40rFSvSYEz-qc1q_
cOQapaAMOwQ%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wijoumed/CACubOwjH_%2Bs%2BVQuYJsZr9oR40rFSvSYEz-qc1q_cOQapaAMOwQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"WikiJMed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to wijoumed+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to wijoumed(a)googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
https://groups.google.com/group/wijoumed.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/
msgid/wijoumed/CAJikOOxGSPoSfRtDCqrfRggummx87KHBprrsW2HTXY4Uoq1%3D%3Dg%
40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wijoumed/CAJikOOxGSPoSfRtDCqrfRggummx87KHBprrsW2HTXY4Uoq1%3D%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.