Dear Jackie Whether you like it or not, I would remain a well wisher and contributor to WikiJournals. My allegiance is to the Open Knowledge movement, and not to you. I would only wish that you forsake your personal ego and think in the best interest of the good things that you are involved in. Please do not mess them up. My good wishes for are contained in the lines you have quoted. I insist that you develop a perspective of being able to look at the brighter side of things. I have mentioned certain good attributes that I have felt to be essential for the board members. If you do not have them, try and acquire them. If you have them, congratulations. Stop detecting hubris when it is not there. Nevertheless, I do have integrity and dedication something I doubt whether you have ever been able to respect. Earlier you had detected discrimination when it was not there. At least learn from your previous mistakes (well you would need to appreciate them first). My posting on the social media was an essential step that no board member cared to undertake prior to me. My response to Mr. Turki was based on my experience, and was a helpful one. Please learn to respect what is good. Please learn to understand what is good for the journal. Please realise that by initiating such discussions you might be hampering the cordial environment on the public forum of the WikiJournals. There are so many people reading this thread. They perhaps have more important concerns than be concerned by what you feel uncomfortable about. Please assume good faith. Markus Pössel had stressed on its importance earlier. There was a message contained in the message I sent. I would only hope that you would be able to comprehend that. You would only be able to do that if you can forsake your ego. You have my best wishes. Regards Diptanshu Note to the EiCs: Please take appropriate actions if somebody demonstrates 'battleground mentality'. I feel that it can seriously affect the health of the journals. Additionally, I would denounce the project if you can pass a resolution on-wiki that only board members can contribute to the well being of the journals. Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to. On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 at 21:51, Jackie <jackie.koerner(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Fully agree I think moderation is a good first step BW ML Op wo 10 okt. 2018 15:45 schreef Markus Pössel <poessel(a)mpia.de>de>:

I would have assumed that his resignation was "under a cloud", that is, the removal motion would be nearly certain to have carried forward and would have achieved the same effects. And Dipanshu, regurgitating and frequently mentioning policy names like "assume good faith" doesn't mean anything if you don't act upon it. Assuming good faith only extends up to a certain point until the other party exhibits clear evidences of bad faith. I think I can speak for most, if not all, that we have crossed that bridge already. Even after your resignation from the board, you still continued to exhibit battleground mentality and trying to "settle the score". At this point, I am seriously pondering whether we should declare him as persona non grata from the project and the mailing list. Andrew ________________________________ From: WikiJournal-en &lt;wikijournal-en-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org&gt; on behalf of Dr. Diptanshu Das &lt;das.diptanshu(a)gmail.com&gt; Sent: October 10, 2018 6:46 PM To: WikiJournal (currently at Wikiversity) Subject: Re: [WikiJournal-en] A quote Markus * First thing first, "assume good faith" * You really don't need to go down the rabbit hole. There was a clear learning message in the email. Accept it and call it a day. * Caring for the well-being of the journal should be a priority more than any personal ego. Realise that. * You might have missed Thomas's email. This mailing list reaches a lot of people and therefore does not seem to be the best place to go down the rabbit hole * You can accept the learning lesson, or not. I had communicated that I expect the board members to be wise and to accept the learning lesson. Nevertheless, the choice is yours. Irrespective of anything, you need not send others down the rabbit hole. Be wise Regards Diptanshu Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to. On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 19:15, Markus Pössel <poessel@mpia.de<mailto:poessel@mpia.de>> wrote: Dear all, do we really need to go down that particular rabbit hole again? Recall that Diptanshu had resigned earlier from the WikiJournal of Medicine Board, and the WikiJournal Council, narrowly pre-empting a removal for harassment. (cf. https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_of_Medicine/Editorial_boar…) Diptanshu's earlier e-mail seems to be a continuation of his campaign to argue that the accusations of harassment were overblown. And Diptanshu's response continues the same patronizing-defensive behavior he showed in his earlier communications on the harassment matter, in this case admonishing Jackie to "forsake [her] personal ego" and belittling her statement of feeling uncomfortable about Diptanshu's behavior. In short: In terms of Diptanshu's not realizing and acknowledging in full what he did wrong (back then and now), and instead telling those around him what to do, this seems to be heading in the same direction as the earlier long e-mail exchange that led to the initiation of the board removal procedures. Thomas, Mikael: Could you please take additional steps now, before history repeats itself? All the best, Markus --- ---------------------------------------------- Dr. Markus Pössel Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg poessel@mpia.de<mailto:poessel@mpia.de> ---------------------------------------------- NOTE: While this e-mail might reach you on the week-end or at a time not within the usual working hours, please know that this is a matter of my personal work-life balance only, and that I do not expect to receive an answer outside the usual work hours. On 2018-10-07 19:09, Dr. Diptanshu Das wrote: _______________________________________________ WikiJournal-en mailing list WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:WikiJournal-en@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en

Dear Michael Your concern is genuine but different from that of Jackie. Your concern about long emails on an official list is salient and I would try to take care of the issue. Nevertheless, trying to handle the ramifications of a single issue all together automatically make a response long even if there are multiple independent points contained. I will see what I can do about it. Regards Diptanshu Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to. On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 22:48, Michaël Laurent &lt;michael.laurent(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: