Sounds good to me.
Arno
----- Original Message -----
From: "James D. Forrester" <james(a)jdforrester.org>
To: "'English Wikipedia'" <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Don't push POV into the Wikipedia software and policies
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:33:30 -0000
On Thursday, February 24, 2005 5:36 PM, Tony Sidaway
<minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com> wrote:
Stan Shebs said:
Even though we ourselves might not want a
bowdlerized WP,
it would be extraordinarily convenient to have some kind
of subset quasi-mirror that advertised themselves as
"child-safe".
Absolutely. This is what I've been proposing for some time.
Indeed. It's called "Wikipedia 1.0", and /that/ can have filtering and
whathaveyou as much as you want, with a "child-friendly" default (whatever
that is). My, and I think perhaps quite a few others', main problem with the
use of server-side filtering is that it evidently won't be 100% effective in
a dynamic environment, and it only takes one slip-up - just one - to cause a
PR problem of which it seems to be primarily developed with a mind to
attempting to avoid. I would absolutely /love/ to participate in the
Wikipedia 1.0 project, including very much content-categorisation.
So how about it, everybody? ;-)
Yours,
--
James D. Forrester -- Wikimedia: [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]]
Mail: james(a)jdforrester.org | jon(a)eh.org | csvla(a)dcs.warwick.ac.uk
IM : (MSN) jamesdforrester(a)hotmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
_______________________________________________
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages