Sherool wrote:
Our current policy is that we want our content to be (completely) free
(wich include the ability to make derivative works) *especialy* in
comunity space (since all user contributions are supposed to be free
licensed). Granted this is more for "philosophical" reasons (we are a free
content project and all that) than practical legal ones, but it *is* the
current policy, in fact is is one of the 5 pillars of the project wich
states "(...)Do not submit copyright infringements **or works licensed in
a way incompatible with the GFDL**." (emphasis mine), and just for the
record ND licenses are not compatable with the GFDL.
Personally, I prefer to be guided by that core policy as if it simply
read, "Respect copyright." Core policies should be simple and
straigtforward, and adhering to them on that basis makes more common
sense than trying to keep up to date with the whims of the professional
policy writers.
Ec