Daniel Mayer wrote:
Do we still need to be so oriented toward editing when
we already have well
over 4,000 edits a day and nearly 200,000 articles? A slow-down in editing
and increased emphasis on getting things in stable form should become more of
a priority. IMO, the best way to market that - both internally and externally
- is by using
nupedia.org to host the stable content.
I agree with everything mav said here.
I just *HATE* the name Nupedia.
It's the "nu" for "new", and also the fact that "new"
won't really mean
much in, say, 20 years' time.