Gareth Owen wrote:
Are you seriously suggesting that the late Mr. Bowman,
Eagle Scout
and computer specialist is a reasonable target for an article in an
encyclopedia.
In wikipedia, I would say 'yes, unquestionably, absolutely'. Wiki Is
Not Paper. In wikipedia 1.0 for print/dvd, etc., then we will face
constraints that we don't face on wikipedia proper.
I wouldn't have much interest in working on such an article, but I see
absolutely no problem with it.
If so, then there is such little common ground between
what we think
belongs in an encyclopedia, that further discussion is worthless.
I'd be intrigued to see the opinions of others.
O.k., there's mine. :-) But I hope that further discussion is not
really worthless.
--Jimbo