On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:57:22 +0100, "MacGyverMagic/Mgm"
<macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
And to tell you the truth, I don't think unreliable
info is useful to begin
with.
Precisely. If you want unreliable info, uncyclopaedia has much which
is authoritatively unreliable.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG