I've been doing a bit of that, but it seems to up
the ante and open the
floodgates rather than awe and silence.
Fred
From: Stan Shebs <shebs(a)apple.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:53:52 -0800
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: Arbitration Committee term lengths
Fred Bauder wrote:
In many cases users try to solve problems by
upping the ante, trying
essentially to overwealm, necessarily calling forth some remedy which
restricts.
Ah yes, the rise of "arbcom lawyers". My impression is that it
would help the arbitration process for the AC to be seen as
somewhat unpredictable, a la irascible courtroom judges - revert
an edit or mouth off on an evidence page, boom, banned for a week
with no appeal, irrespective of the merits of the overall case.
After reading some of what gets thrown in front of the AC, I can
see why the "contempt of court" concept was invented! :-)
Stan
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org