"Jimmy Wales" <jwales(a)bomis.com> schrieb:
You're making the argument that since someday,
some lonely person
might have enough freetime to waste typing in thousands and thousands
of entries in the manner of a robot, we have to delete any and every
article that's too trivial today.
I think that are some missing steps in that deduction, so that the
conclusion does not follow from the premises.
I'll add the missing steps:
Either these articles are having a positive effect on Wikipedia, and then
we should allow this hypothetical person or a bot, not ban them. Or these
articles are having a negative effect on Wikipedia, and then it's good
thing to delete them.
Andre Engels