Gutza as usual is correct, and I apologise for even
commenting at all. All in good fun --if not good
taste.
I read about half of that discussion list, and it
seems like the typical conversation about wiki -- is
it a valid source? How can it be trusted. etc. A very
enlightening thread actually, looking at uninitiated
newbies juggling the same paradoxical concept that we
all still deal with -- namely 'despite the fact that
it shouldnt work at all it does.' [paraphrasing Jimbo]
-S-
--- Gutza <gutza(a)moongate.ro> wrote:
I think banning him would probably prove the point
that Wikipedia isn't
completely unregulated. But then again, it would
probably also prove
that we're fascists to such a person. Not banning
him would prove him
that Wikipedia is unreliable. Talking about him
proves that we're a
bunch of losers who have nothing better to do. So I
think ignoring the
guy would probably be the best thing to do, along
with keeping an eye on
his IP and reverting his changes, should some more
occur in the future.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com