From: "David Gerard"
<dgerard(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:28:26 +0000
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] User Pages & Editing in Wikipedia
On 28/12/06, Marc Riddell <michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net> wrote:
OK - I'm learning. There is very much of the
technical aspects of Wikipedia
I know nothing about. It may seem like grasping, but it's really trying to
wrestle with, what I see is a large problem.
When you started this thread, I assumed you were an old Wikipedia hand
who knew his stuff. That's probably a compliment ;-)
The material stuff in Wikipedia I can handle. It's the bots & blips and all
the behind-the-scenes computer stuff that makes my eyes cross and brings a
buzz to my brain that even Mary Jane can't match :-).
But, I believe, with all of the
human, intelligent resources within the Wikipedia community, a solution can
be found. I'm just not willing at this point to leave it at "there's
nothing
that can be done".
Mmm. I think that you may be asking the wrong question: that is,
you're making the implicit assumption that a user page can be trusted
to ascertain whether a contributor to a page knows their stuff.
In practice, I don't think that's the case. On Wikipedia, the
contributors are listed in the history, and someone I don't know other
than a two-page detailed userpage is not necessarily a better writer
than an anonymous IP that puts in well-written statements of fact with
good checkable references.
When a reader views a Wikipedia page, they need to apply critical
thought to it, like they do to any web page. We can't take that
requirement away from the reader (and become a "trusted" source). But
with references, we can *enable* them to apply critical thought to
Wikipedia.
So it's all about the contributions themselves and the source material
that backs the contributions up. The contributors themselves are not a
focus at all. That's "no ownership of pages."
- d.
Sources can be checked. What I'm presenting to are the totally mindless,
malicious vandal edits by totally anonymous fools who have complete access
to the encyclopedia. Perhaps I am being naive, but I believe a named,
accountable User Page would go a long way to ridding Wikipedia of them.
Marc
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l