(sorry for the late reply; was on vacation)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Ian Woollard <ian.woollard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/03/2008, Steve Bennett
<stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Since there is very little consensus over the
"correct" ordering of
metadata, any tool which reformats metadata in some rigid format is
bound to step on some toes. Which is probably just an argument for
*reaching* some consensus on metadata formatting, of course.
Yes, I've been using the tool for actual editing and that's already
happened; somebody claimed that there was a 'right' way to order the
interwiki language markups and rearranged it after I submitted.
If there's a "right" way, the tool can be altered to use it.
The other problems I've had have been that one
time the tool took an
image on the end of a section I was editing and placed it in the
interwiki language box. It kinda confused me because the image wasn't
where I expected. ;-)
Uh. I'll fix that...
I also have been having issues with the references;
this is one area
where the editing tool shows great potential, but there's currently no
way to edit a reference, without entirely deleting it and recreating
it from scratch, which is a *huge* nuisance.
Did you double-click on the entry in the list box? That should do it.
Cheers,
Magnus