On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:23:46 +0600, Arno M
<redgum46(a)lycos.com> wrote:
Sigh! I shouldn't have bitten.
The Australia page has been through this before, and the ,um, debate,
involving someone called Daeron , whose views seem similar to yours,
can be found on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Australia/Archive_2.
Some dodgy reasoning and a lot of shouting. No definitive source given.
Peter is not correct, period. India is a republic,
yes, but Australia is not.
Australia is a republic using just about every definition I've ever
seen. Including Wikipedia's.
Look, this is my last word on the matter on the mailing list, but I
notice that you haven't given us your sources on here. Your assertion is
extremely dodgy, and not even the ARM agree with you!
TBSDY