2009/5/6 Carcharoth <carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com>om>:
On reflection, there is lots of vandalism to that talk
page, and it
doesn't match Liddle's description of what he claims to have added.
i.e. Unless he gives more details, he is almost certainly having us on
here. But doing so in a magazine article like that without providing a
link that would demonstrate the truth of what he is saying just shows
how little he understands how a wiki works.
Well I went through the [[Rob Liddle]] to see If I could find him
defending himself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=104862199&…
Perhaps but nothing of significance on the Cristiano Ronaldo article
around that date.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=prev&oldi…
Again possible but nothing of significance on the Cristiano Ronaldo
article around that date
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=prev&oldi…
Loads of vandalism on Cristiano Ronaldo around that date but nothing
that fits Liddle's claims.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/81.156.42.14
Is another candidate but again nothing
--
geni