And war to control the content of the "NPOV" article is not a disastrous
idea?
Fred Bauder
No, it's a disastrous idea; it's inherently
antithetic to NPOV. What
you'd be doing is creating articles that are deliberately non NPOV.
Content FORKS are never, ever desirable.
On 27/06/2010, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
Yes, articles from diverse points of view would
be good.
Fred Bauder
I have come across topics that are approached
differently by different
groups and thought that parallel articles might be appropriate in
those cases. I'd like a wider view on the topic. Here is where I've
discussed it on talk pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Jewish_Vers…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David#King_David_in_Judaism
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard