> On
05/06/07, Marc Riddell <michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>> The archives of this List are FULL of suggestions for change (some actually
>>> workable ;-)). The question is how, and where, do we take those suggestions
>>> to be acted upon?
on 6/5/07 5:26 PM, David Gerard at dgerard(a)gmail.com wrote:
>> Good question. An idea has to be both
convincing and inspiring to
>> really take. The politics of large-scale volunteer collaboration ...
>> you need to make people *want* to implement your idea.
On 05/06/07, Marc Riddell <michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net> wrote:
But, as I understand it, we are not talking about
the style, or other such
changes, related to editing the content of the encyclopedia. But, rather,
changes related to the very structure of its management.
on 6/5/07 6:05 PM,
David Gerard at dgerard(a)gmail.com wrote:
Same there too. It's more work, of course. And it
has to be a really
good idea and you have to be really convincing with it. It's a process
of herding cats.
David,
Where, and/or to whom, do we take ideas involving management structural
changes in Wikipedia?
Marc