On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
How does that
reduce the scope of the policy?
Because it says there is only a problem if the material is doubtful. An
unsourced statement that is not challenged and not likely to be
challenged -- and that is not libelous if untrue, I should add -- is not
to be removed, according to WP:V.
Oh, I wish.
This still is subject to people who go around challenging random articles,
which I think is an abuse of the process. It really ought to say "sincerely
challenged", but it doesn't...