SPUI wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
> Probably the best way, then, to work around the
poisonous dysfunction
> of xFD is to make the deletion moot by merging it into the town
> article and making the name a redirect.
Lucky me - I'd already done that for the ones that
have been deleted,
despite the guide to VFD warning against it! Ah, the joy of cheating the
system.
It says *what*? Remove that promptly. If you don't want to, I will.
That will have been put there by some idjit who feels a burning need
to hamper the operation of Wikipedia for the sake of a
higher-throughput deletion procedure. Bollocks to that - merging
content is always an option.
Now all we need is someone complaining that it
shouldn't be in
the town article, but at least that can't be brushed under the rug with
vfd, just a nice healthy revert war.
Let's see if it's started by someone who *just happens* to be a VFD habitue.
- d.