On 1/3/07, Gurch <matthew.britton(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
facts aren't copyrightable. Whether a collection
of Wikipedia infoboxes
can be equated with a collection of facts is another matter, though; if
that was true, surely it could be argued that the rest of the article is
also no more than a collection of facts, and hence not subject to copyright?
In case of doubt, only a judge can give you a preliminary answer as
long as there is a superior court.
Mathias