What makes you think that I have a problem with
anyones behavior? Why do you think it is
counter-productive to make a focussed review of
someone's edits?
Honestly. The only thing that is counter-productive is
the continual insistence by some people to block me
because I want to review someone's edits.
If all edits are open to scrutiny, then there
shouldn't be an issue.
The Recycling Troll
--- Tony Sidaway <minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com>
wrote:
Recycling Troll said:
why are
people afraid of scrutiny??
All edits on Wikipedia are public and open to
scrutiny, so the question is
a non sequitur. What you seem to be doing goes
beyond that, apparently,
and that may be why some people seem to have a
problem with your edits. I
think it's wrong to describe this kind of thing as
"stalking", but it's
certainly counter-productive behavior. If you have
a problem with
someone's behavior why not just use the dispute
resolution process instead
of your current method?
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/