On 25 Mar 2008 at 00:03:47 UTC, "David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Which would be you falling afoul of the fallacy that
"all A is B
therefore all B is A." You need to think why in this case you're
wrong.
The lesson I got out of it was "If A has a bigger and more powerful
clique of friends and supporters than B, then by definition A is
right and B is a troll," but what do A and B equal in *your*
explanation?
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site:
http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips:
http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site:
http://domains.dan.info/