-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Snowspinner wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 9:31 PM, James D. Forrester
wrote:
We've been doing this for two whole years
now. Couldn't some of the
people who - despite **not a single change or new statement made in the
past month** have all of a sudden started protesting (and, I must point
out, entirely justifiably) - have actually tried to start a real
discussion, instead of a point-by-point aimless hybrid nothingness of a
set of discussions randomly and uselessly lumped together.
In practice? Probably not.
Ha. Well, even so, I would like to apologise for that rant of mine. It
was foolish of me to post it; I would like to blame it on being both
very tired and greatly distressed by the sudden rise in people who are
interested in the rather tricky matter of how to chose the appointments
to the Committee as compared to the past year as I've been talking to
people and trying to find someone, anyone who actually cares, but that
would be ducking the blame, and I wouldn't want to do that.
I'm sorry, especially to anyone who might have felt that I was attacking
them. That was not my intent, and certainly is not my motive in general.
Yours sincerely,
- --
James D. Forrester
Wikimedia : [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]]
E-Mail : james(a)jdforrester.org
IM (MSN) : jamesdforrester(a)hotmail.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDjRqNkn3kUxZyJx0RAgMLAKCDiwv0WYK8Hw6YLu/MFY/p8CyzhACghLuo
BlGQkouHyrCNGB80vnmfF5I=
=biDR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----