On 31/05/07, Will Beback <will.beback.1(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There are serious issues regarding "attack
sites." My regrettable
response to this one site should not derail the discussion of the
general topic. I acknowledge over-reacting and suggest that the better
definition of "attack site" will minimize similar errors. Again, my
apologies to the community for any disruption.
I suggest throwing out notions that "all links to attack sites shall
be removed", however phrased.
It's a matter of usage, not the mere fact of the link.
- d.