Doesn't mean there won't be anything now.
Anyway, "Reliable Sources" seems to be a very flexible phrase around
WP. If we didn't have Notability to fight about, we could have the
exact same fights there.
We''ve already redefined N this year to mean N for over a year if it's
a living person, regardless of the number and status of the sources,
and I suppose we could define RS to mean blog sources only for people
whom we approve of--we've been using them freely for science fiction
and Unix/Linux people.
On 11/15/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:30:27 +0000, "James
Farrar"
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Having an
article because they hate us is no better than not having
one because they hate us.
[[Daniel Brandt]], for instance...
(OK, technically we don't have an article on him not because he hates
us, /per se/, but because after 14 AFDs reasonable people got bored
with the circus and threw in the towel.)
Got good, non-trivial biographical sources about Brandt? I know
where to find deletion review.
Brandt's article was deleted for lack of sources.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.