Putting aside the fact that I find your criteria
outrageous, have you looked at LT's contributions?
What is the problem?
Mark
--- John Robinson <john(a)freeq.com> wrote:
Fred Bauder wrote:
I definitely want to see some evidence and also
some information about what
would be evidence. How do we determine that
someone
is a reincarnation of a
previously banned user?
It's pretty simple really, using the old saw:
1) They look like a duck. Check, derivative
usernames (Entmoots of
Trolls, JRR Trollkien, Leo Trollstoy)
2) They walk like a duck. Check, editing mostly the
same articles as
the banned user did.
3) They quack like a duck. Check, the edits made to
the
above-mentioned articles are virtually the same as
those made by the
banned user.
Even with all three of these being the case, it is
hypothetically
possible that they are not, indeed, a reincarnation
of the banned
user. However I think it is overkill to go to their
house, knock on
their door and ask "Hey, are you [banned user]?"
Assuming that the
banned user was banned for their behavior, it makes
sense that a new
account displaying the same behavior should also be
banned.
-Hephaestos>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.