The example is compelling when one is aware of the facts and not merely a single well
publicized even in mass media spin. This may be a useful example for your PR issues
also.
http://www.prwatch.org/node/2921
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/20/bush_guard_records/index.html
http://www.prwatch.org/node/2916
Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com> wrote: Steve Bennett wrote:
Notability at the fact level is even harder to
determine than
notability at the subject level. Ask a republican whether Bush's
alleged administrative adventures in the National Guard were
"notable". Ask a Democrat the same.
Hmm, I might be convinced by what you are saying here, but this example
does not seem compelling to me. I think, based on my limited
recollection of this case, that it more or less turned out that the
"alleged administrative adventures" were more or less cooked up, i.e.
that this was a non-scandal. But I would suspect that reasonable
Republicans would take the same view that I do: the overall incident is
still notable, of course.
But I still might agree with your basic point, that notability at the
fact level is harder to determine that notability at the subject level.
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.