On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, in the extremely unlikely event that WR became
notable, we might
want to have a link to the website on the article about the website.
That's one. I've heard one more possibility advanced so far, if there
were an arbcom case that involved evidence on WR.
With the latter, all we'd have to do is e-mail the link, or a
screenshot of the post, to the ArbCom.