Hmm. Ok, deleted and recreated with the good version to remove the history.
Semi-protection and move-full-protection of infinite duration. Did I miss anything?
It may be better to merge his article in with that of the union he's head of. There
don't appear to be all that many sources out there we could use to help us build a
better article, but I don't pretend to have looked to closely. He is head of a
decent-sized (?) union, after all. We'll see.
Oh, and Jimbo, I hope you've noticed you might be appointing a new arbitrator pretty
soon. How much of our time has that poisonous piece of slime, Daniel Brandt, wasted? God
damn him.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:36:40 -0400
From: jwales(a)wikia.com
To: wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] An example of a bad biography
1. None of the offending ip numbers was blocked, ever.
2. RyRy5, not really intentionally as far as I can tell, restored the
worst version after an anon had cleaned it up!
3. East718 did the right thing and semi-protected... but only on April
26th, many days after the vandalism spree had died down
The article has never, even once, contained any useful information about
the victim. It has always been a stub. A quick look around the web
suggests that it will never be more than a stub.
(Of the top 10 hits in google, more are about his wikipedia entry than
anything else!)
All of the following is still in the article history, where it might be
read by Mr. Kinnear's children, his mother, future employers, etc.
I propose that policies still need a lot of work to get us to where we
need to be on BLP.
Please read all of the following, and ask whether it reflects the values
we all hold for our project.
_________________________________________________________________
100’s of prizes to be won at
BigSnapSearch.com
http://www.bigsnapsearch.com