G'day Steve,
On 3/2/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
wrote:
Ahh! That's the same rule that applies to
sourced edit. If that's the
case why bother even having the rule at all?
Good point. There probably shouldn't be a "rule" about when to remove
unsourced edits. Just some guidelines to be applied with common sense.
It's prolly important to include something to the effect of if you *do*
remove an unsourced edit because it's unsourced, then you're not going
to get in trouble. That's something that policy's actually useful for,
actually --- as is [[WP:IAR]] ...
--
Mark Gallagher
"But the visibility was very poor, and you yourself admit that you were
being struck by thunderbolts all the time, which must have distracted
your attention, so it is more than probable you were mistaken."
- Esmond Haddock, /The Mating Season/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/272 - Release Date: 1/03/2006