The problem here is that 172, a confirmed revert warrior, got put on revert
parole and was unable to conform to its requirements. He needed to be able
to revert frequently in order to maintain the ideological bias he advocates.
Trapped, he is lashing out.
Fred
From: geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>om>, English Wikipedia
<wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 03:29:18 +0000
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Rules, expertise, and encyclopedic standards
but when a
policy related to process is broken, it will attract a huge contingent of
users fussing over who reverted whom, how many reverts there were, and what
did or did not constitute a revert. The rules are shaping a culture on
Wikipedia utterly obsessed with process, but incognizant of product.
Go on name names. When it comes to keeping an eye on the 3RR section
of the admins notice board I would be impressed if you come up with
more than three. That is hardly a huge crowd.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l