There is very good reason why we should have articles--good objective clear
ones--on diploma mills, once they have actually started in business and
issuing degrees. Whatever maintenance they take is well worth it. There are
a number of people always glad to give a 3rd opinion at any "university"
articles where there is trouble in keeping to a NPOV.
On Jan 3, 2008 1:53 PM, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2008 1:28 PM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I also
thought of something while waiting for your response. If
maintenance is the problem, wouldn't protection be better than
deletion? Instead of deleting 80% of articles on "universities" to
reduce the maintenance load, why not protect them on a rotating
schedule where 20% are unprotected each day during a five day period?
Because articles are created with maintenance problems
I for one don't have a problem with deleting articles which have
always sucked and can't be trivially fixed.
and restricting editing on the scale is not
acceptable.
But deleting articles on this scale is acceptable? Doesn't article
deletion restrict editing?
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.