On 16 May 2012 19:41, Gwern Branwen <gwern0(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
And why haven't they taken those who
generalise broadly from a single
example with them?
Are you denying the general decline in editors, even as Internet usage
continues to increase?
Are you perpetrating a "straw man" fallacy? I'll happily assert that I
find fewer hoax articles than I used to (in fact none I think for a
couple of years). One crafted to get past New Pages Patrol doesn't
mean much.
Charles