On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:35:44 -0800, "Matthew Brown" <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'd guess a good plan to source such a list would
be to find an
authoritative source - e.g. a trade journal - listing publications
that cater to this market. One could then define the list as being
'models who have appeared in publications classified as 'big bust' in
Adult Industry Journal', or something like that. Of course,
equivalents would have to be found in other worldwide markets, but I
would imagine that similar things can be found elsewhere.
That would be perfectly acceptable. What we had was a group of
editors getting together to decide that these women had big tits,
then, on being challenged, deciding on an arbitrary definition of big
based on what they thought was big, and then using the invariably
unreliable self-reported data from the women themselves to judge
inclusion. That is problematic on many levels.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG