slimvirgin(a)gmail.com wrote:
A member of the arbitration committee told an editor a
few weeks ago
that the equal-treatment policy of the arbitration committee had been
adopted deliberately in order to discourage editors from bringing
cases. Wikipedia is so slow today that I haven't yet been able to find
the posts where this was said, but it was fairly unambiguous, and I'm
pretty sure I'm remembering it correctly.
Perhaps members of the arbitration committee could say here whether
the policy of symmetrical treatment has been adopted, officially or
otherwise, in order to cut down on the number of cases coming to
arbitration.
There isn't such a policy, by name or effect, as far as I know.
We do however try very hard to look at the entire situation and understand
what on earth is actually going on. And we often disagree amongst ourselves
as to what's actually going on. That's why it's a committee, not a single
impeccably fairminded individual such as myself for example. It's not a
seamless borg working in lockstep.
- d.