On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:58:20 -0700, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
If there
are no secondary sources I'd say it was unencyclopaedic
anyway. Mind you, for my money we'd have a single one-paragraph
article on the entire subject of Pokémon...
What makes something encyclopedic is that there are people who want to
read about the subject.
Not really. Judging by teh intarwebs most people want to read about
reality TV and porn ;-)
For some people Pokémon is reality TV. :-)
The Pokémon characters are sufficiently secretive thsat any pornographic
interaction between them is unlikely to be verifiable. :-)
Ec