On 13/09/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/13/06, Carl Peterson
<carlopeterson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What would be ideal is if we could establish a
content-area (i.e.,
> WikiProject) peer review as a prerequisite for the purposes of content (esp.
> for technical articles) then have it go to a "Brilliant Prose Committee"
of
> qualified persons (e.g., people with actual degrees or a lot of experience)
> to evaluate the writing style, the readibility, the grammar, etc. But that
> borders on instruction creep and would be strongly opposed as it creates an
> elite class distinction and would knock out all the lovely people who derive
> meaning in life from firing torpedoes at FACs.
You have suggested a committee. Generaly that
isn't a good sign.
In particular, a committee won't scale to 100,000. What will?
- d.