On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:58:20 -0700, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
>If there are no secondary sources I'd say it
was unencyclopaedic
>anyway. Mind you, for my money we'd have a single one-paragraph
>article on the entire subject of Pokémon...
What makes something encyclopedic is that there are
people who want to
read about the subject.
Not really. Judging by teh intarwebs most people want to read about
reality TV and porn ;-)
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG