--- Rick <giantsrick13(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Please see [[User talk:Simplebrain#Please also
respond to request from other editors to
collaborate]]. User:Simplebrain is attempting to
withdraw his edits from the [[Science of Value]]
article, and when I suggested that he cannot do so,
[[User:Dr Zen]] advised him to institute legal
action.
When I read the discussion, it sure sounds like we're
dealing with the original founder of the modern study
of "Science of Value". As such, isn't this page either
vanity or original research? Isn't it therefore a ripe
candidate for VFD?
Aside from RickK's addition of {{cleanup}} and
{{wikify}}, only user:Hu and user:Gene Ward Smith have
made any changes to Simplebrain's work. Hu made a
single effort to remove POV while retaining the
essence of the entry. Gene Ward Smith's edits amount
to a negative critique of the concept.
Essentially, what we have is a simple "he said, she
said" between someone's original research and a single
critic.
Perhaps we can work for a true NPOV presentation of
the concepts, but can't we just do everyone a favor
and delete the current article?
-Rich Holton (en.wikipedia:user:rholton)
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com