On 8/18/06, Sarah <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
... Someone
in that case was posting long screeds of damaging claims to the talk
page because editors were resisting allowing it into the article.
There are lots of ways material can be discussed with directly
referring to it, and people can ask for a reliable source for all
edits....
For the record, the "screeds" were in fact direct quotes with proper cites
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_E…
added without comment
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&oldid=289923…
In sum, a proper cite was deemed a "personal attack" on a "privileged
expert".
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability&…