Anthere wrote:
I think the picture of the circumsized penis has
nothing to do in that
article and should be moved to the article about circumsision (a
difficult word to spell).
If no one does it, I will (open threat :-))
Leave the photo of the circumsized penis at [[penis]]. Nothing wrong with it
being there as a compare/contrast photo set with uncircumcised penis. You
also allude to a very important point - a great many men (perhaps most) in
the U.S. are circumsized and it has nothing to do with religion.
-- mav