The WikiMoney plan was mostly humourous, as I said:
"dont take it very seriously".
I agree to list pages first on Cleanup and then to
VfD. For how much time would list the pages on
Cleanup? I suggest to open a poll and let the
community to vote on it. My vote is "same as VfD lag
time", i.e. 5 days. But I don't really have any
problem with the "2 weeks" suggestion.
--Optim
--- Dan Miller <meelar2(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
For those who haven't been following the
discussion
on
Talk: Votes for Deletion, I thought I'd drag this
idea
into the light of debate:
I agree that the VfD process is overused; look at
the
relatively high proportion of "keep" votes. Ideally,
only pages that are relatively clear-cut cases would
go here, with the rest being moved to cleanup or
elsewhere. But the WikiMoney plan would harm new
users, and also be quite complicated to use. Why not
a
better plan, such as:
Before any page can be listed on regular VfD, it
must
be listed on cleanup and left there for some time;
I'm
thinking two weeks, but this is negotiable. After
that, it can be moved to VfD, and a vote can be
held.
Of course, the regular candidates for speedy
deletion
could go, and the copyvio delete page would be
unaffected. Not only would this solve the overuse of
VfD, it would also help stop the occasional listing
on
VfD of copyvios. And, it could be accomplished by
simply placing a notice at the top of the VfD page,
rather than encumbering everyone with a complicated
system of WikiMoney, which might frighten newbies
and
irritate old hands.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus"
Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes