The proposal is to noindex upon the subject's request. Isn't it best to let
the people who live with the consequences weigh those pros and cons? If the
main thing they want is to get Wikipedia off the top Google result, then it
may be worth it to them. On principle, I'm not keen on paternalism.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:59 AM,
Durova<nadezhda.durova(a)gmail.com> wrote:
*Suppose we noindexed biographies of living
persons, upon the subject's
request.*
As has been already mentioned, this has all been discussed before, but:
NOINDEXing BLPs does nothing to stop vandalism of them. All it can
hope to do is sweep it under the rug, which is exactly the wrong thing
to do, as vandalism can only be fixed once it has been noticed. The
Siegenthaler incident was so bad because the vandalism went unnoticed
(or at least, uncorrected) for so long.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Durova<nadezhda.durova(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Presum…
"Presumption in favor of privacy"
Those ideas are about what types of content are accepted into BLPs
(and what types of sources are used), and under what circumstances
will we have or not have a BLP. Anyone who cares about these issues
should put their efforts into working on those ideas, as well as on
ideas about improving dealing with vandalism as it happens, instead of
working towards futile obfuscation.
Incidentally, NOINDEXing requires no developer assistance:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:NOINDEX
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l