On 27/11/2007, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am. One big problem on this thread are accusations
without any
specifics. I'm asking for specifics.
So are we but members of a certain mailing list appear to be stonewalling.
Oh, gosh, lesse; is it possible, just possible, that
any of the people
who have commented might have said something in error? That they might
believe (or have believed) something to be true, but were wrong? GASP!
That is up to them to say. Not you to say on their behalf.
Well, again, let's do a little thought experiment.
If what I've read
is correct, there are apparently over two dozen people on the list.
They undoubtedly are of all different ages and nationalities and
ethnicities, have different political, religious views, life
experiences etc. than Durova. Hmm, so would they have different
perspectives than Durova or not?
There are degrees of difference.
I've seen some pretty outrageous stuff on
wikien-l; in any event,
there are obviously far more eyes on wikien-l than the people on this
other list. A number of people have stated publicly that they didn't
read the e-mail, or merely glanced at it without looking at the
detail. Is that now some sort of moral failing on their part?
That would depend on your system of morality.
Um, Matthew and Guy said the exact opposite, that
Durova didn't
propose a block. As far as I can tell these are imaginary "processes".
Imaginary processes don't need fixing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_notic…
--
geni